1.5 The Problem

Get this.. Here is how the Wikipedia editor in contention with me defines the second law..

One may consider an initial set {i } of several thermodynamic systems each its own state of internal thermodynamic equilibrium with entropy {S_i }. There may then occur a thermodynamic operation by which the walls between those systems are changed in permeability or otherwise altered, so that there results a new and final set {f } of physical systems, at first not in thermodynamic equilibrium. Eventually they will settle into their own states of internal thermodynamic equilibrium having entropies {S_f }. The second law asserts that

and that's supposed to explain why a sandcastle will fall down and not back up..!!

The above is absolute BS because it takes no account of 'logically' ordered states like 'information',  only physically ordered states like where one part is hot and another cold. I can't hardly believe such ignorance.. this guy is supported by over 460 observers.. we are in deep trouble.

The best and most meaningful statement of the Second Law is..

  Any system left to itself will tend to move to its most probable state..!

I did finally manage to put a {further explanation needed} tag on the misuse of the word "evolve" (dictionary synonym 'develop') where it should read "decay" hopefully directing people to the 'talk' page to see why.

I also got some clarification into the page on 'Introduction to Entropy'.. but there is a glaring confusion still there to be dealt with.. in particular use of the term "information entropy".. suggesting there are different types of entropy.. there are not..
                       There is only ONE entropy..!

 What I am telling you here is only the tip of the iceberg..