This is all about what I rather cautiously omitted to say in "The God Law".. Its now time to tell it like it is. My journey into the depths of the Second Law grew ever more strange as I progressed from one startling revelation to another. The comparison between what I was reading in the general texts summarizing the current state of 'knowledge' on the subject and what I came up with from my own research was deeply disturbing. It was not so much that the material was obscure by virtue of its mathematical or logical complexity but that it appeared deliberately to be made so. The Wikipedia article on the Second Law summarises the appalling mess being used to cover up the truth.
This fact, obvious to any reasonably educated reader of it, should alert you to the existence of a problem. Something, someone finds far too inconvenient to tell, is being concealed. Now the dark secret is obviously the true understanding of the Second Law, but why should this pose such a problem for science? Well I think its rather obvious their science is not just science its naturalistic secular science which cannot as an a priori accept any non material entity. So if I manage to reveal to you the details of the conspiracy, I would suggest that in itself means you will 'know' that those responsible for the confusion 'know' there really is a non material entity responsible for the universe. Now if your world view is shown to be false.. that I would suggest is much more than having to come to terms with a new theory, its massively devastating and obviously too difficult to accept. The stuff of paradigms. The only question for you is do you really want to know about this?
In any rational presentation of scientifically determined conclusions it is imperative that the terms used are clearly and rigorously defined. I am here to tell you that has not occurred concerning the scientific communities answer to the question:
How did we get here?
So what's missing?
No comments:
Post a Comment